Home Complaints database Campaign to Restore Archaeological Kamalpokhari of Thamel and an anonymous Nepalese organisation vs. Marriott International
Complaint

Campaign to Restore Archaeological Kamalpokhari of Thamel and an anonymous Nepalese organisation vs. Marriott International

Marriott hotel chain’s links to indigenous rights violations in Thamel, Nepal

Date filed
21 August 2023
Keywords
Countries of harm
Current status
Filed
Sector
NCP

Allegations

On 21 August 2023, a complaint was filed with the US NCP alleging that Marriott International, Inc. has not and is not complying with the Guidelines through its franchise in Kathmandu, namely the Aloft Kathmandu Thamel. The complaint was filed by individuals representing two local community organisations: Campaign to Restore Archaeological Kamalpokhari of Thamel and another organisation anonymised due to security concerns.

Marriott is a multinational enterprise in the tourism and accommodation sector. The Aloft Kathmandu Thamel, located in Nepal’s Thamel tourist district, is a hotel within the Chhaya Center, a business complex constructed by Chhaya Devi Complex Pvt. Ltd. “Aloft” is a Marriott brand and occupies a substantial portion of the Center, generating significant revenue for the Complex. The complainants allege that Marriott is direct linked to negative impacts caused by the Complex. The Center’s construction has been tied to human rights violations against the indigenous Newar community, particularly the local Pradhan Newars of Thamel, as it was built on land linked to communal Guthi (trust) lands, traditionally owned by the Pradhans and used for religious and cultural purposes. This land was acquired by Complex in 2008. Legal disputes and protests have arisen over the legitimacy of this land conversion to private ownership, with ongoing court cases since 2014. Activists linked to the complainants have also faced threats and harassment due to their opposition to the Complex’s construction. 

Relevant OECD Guidelines

Outcome

The complaint has not been published due to the US NCP’s confidentiality rules.

More details

Defendant
Company in violation
Other companies involved
Complainants
Affected people

Documents