OECD Watch Logo
  • How to file a complaint?
    • Stage One: Deciding whether to file
    • Stage Two: Preparing and filing the complaint
    • Stage Three: Initial assessment
    • Stage Four: Good offices
    • Stage Five: Final statement and follow-up
    • Other filing considerations
      • Transparency and Campaigning
      • Parallel proceedings
    • Filing tools & resources
      • OECD Watch case check
  • Complaints database
  • OECD & NCPs
    • About the OECD
    • The OECD Guidelines
      • OECD Guidelines update
    • National Contact Points (NCPs)
      • List of NCPs
      • Due diligence
      • OECD accession
    • NCP Evaluations
      • NCP Evaluations
      • NCP Evaluations Methodology
      • NCP Evaluations Outcomes and Analysis
    • Advisory Groups
  • News & publications
    • Subscribe to newsletter
  • About us
    • Our work
      • Research & analysis
      • Policy & advocacy
      • Training & capacity building
      • Remedy campaign
    • Mission, vision & values
    • Team
      • Coordination Committee
    • Members
    • How to join
    • Donations
    • Contact
Share Menu
Share this
  • twitter Created with Sketch.
  • facebook Created with Sketch.
  • linkedin Created with Sketch.
  • email Created with Sketch.
  • print Created with Sketch.
Home Complaints database Communal landowners vs Excellon Resources
Complaint

Communal landowners vs Excellon Resources

Excellon Resources’ dispute with landowners in Mexico

Date filed
28 May 2012
Keywords
  • Disclosure,
  • Environment,
  • Human rights,
  • Labour rights,
  • Land rights
Countries of harm
  • Mexico
Current status
Rejected
Sector
  • Mining
NCP
  • NCP Mexico

Allegations

A group of communal landowners from the Ejido “La Sierrita de Galeana” (La Sierrita) and several Canadian and Mexican civil society organisations allege that Excellon Resources has breached OECD Guidelines provisions on disclosure, human rights, employment and environment.

In 2008, La Sierrita agreed to lease a portion of their land to Excellon Resources for the development of the company’s La Platosa poly-metallic (silver, lead and zinc) mine. The complaint alleges Excellon Resources has breached the land rental contract with La Sierrita. The complainants allege that Excellon Resources failed to obtain consent before engaging in exploration activities on land outside the area designated in the contract and has also failed to take any steps to comply with its contractual obligation to build a water treatment plant, leading to reduced potable water supplies and contamination of La Sierrita.

The complainants furthermore contend that the company sought to stop workers from joining a local affiliate of the mining union, thereby violating the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining of workers at the La Platosa mine. The complaint accuses Excellon Resources of engaging in worker intimidation and actively supporting a “rogue” union to strategically undermine the unionization efforts of the SNTMMSSRM. The complainants contend the company has aggressively misled investors about the local labour dispute as well.

Relevant OECD Guidelines

  • Chapter III
  • Chapter III Paragraph 1
  • Chapter III Paragraph 2 g
  • Chapter IV
  • Chapter IV Paragraph 1
  • Chapter IV Paragraph 2
  • Chapter IV Paragraph 6
  • Chapter V
  • Chapter V Paragraph 1 a
  • Chapter V Paragraph 1 b
  • Chapter V Paragraph 2 b
  • Chapter V Paragraph 4 b
  • Chapter V Paragraph 8
  • Chapter VI
  • Chapter VI Paragraph 2 a
  • Chapter VI Paragraph 2 b
  • Chapter VI Paragraph 5

Outcome

The complaint was filed simultaneously at the Mexican and Canadian NCPs. In November 2012, the Mexican NCP rejected the case. The NCP found that the issues raised in the complaint were material but not substantiated. The NCP also cited Excellons unwillingness to participate in any possible NCP-facilitated mediation as a reason for rejecting the case.

The complainants are concerned about the flawed procedures followed by the NCP, including the unreasonably high threshold for accepting a case and the failure to take into account international laws and standards for employment and labour issues. The complainants feel that the NCP exhibited a clear bias toward the company and are concerned by the lack of cooperation with the Canadian NCP, which appears not to have been involved at all.

In 2011, prior to the filing of the specific instance, the Canadian Office of the Extractive Sector CSR Counsellor received a complaint on the same issue and concluded that the request should directly proceed to structured dialogue. However, Excellon withdrew from this process before dialogue could begin. The complainants presentthese varying conclusionsas evidence that the Mexican NCP has unduly rejected the case, particularly as the Canadian official’s detailed investigation included a field visit to the mine site and the surrounding community.

More details

Defendant
  • Excellon Resources
Company in violation
  • Excellon Resources
Complainants
  • Canadian Labour Congress
  • Ejido La Sierrita
  • Local 309, Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores Mineros, Metalúrgicos, Siderúrgicos y Similares de la República Mexicana
  • Mining Watch Canada
  • Project for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
  • Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores Mineros, Metalúrgicos, Siderúrgicos y Similares de la República Mexicana
  • United Steelworkers
Affected people
  • Communities,
  • Human Rights Defenders ,
  • Workers
Other NCP's where the complaint was filed
  • NCP Canada

Documents

  • letter
    9 January 2013

    TUAC (Trade Union Advisory Committee) publishes concerns about the procedures followed by the Mexican NCP.

    Project for Economic, Social and Cultur
  • reject
    28 November 2012

    The Mexican NCP rejects the case.

    NCP Mexico
  • file
    28 May 2012

    Communal landowners file complaint at Canadian and Mexican NCP

    Project for Economic, Social and Cultur
OECD Watch Logo

Visit us

OECD Watch
KNSM-laan 17
1019 LA, Amsterdam
Netherlands
view on google maps

Contact us

Tel: +31 (0)20 639 12 91 (Mon-Fri, 9AM-5PM)
Email: [email protected]
Visit our twitter page Visit our facebook page
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
OECD Watch is hosted by SOMO
Cookies & Privacy
We use cookies to optimise your experience and improve our website.
Functional Always active
These cookies are required in order to use the website. They ensure that the website works properly and that your user preferences remain known. For example, they save you from having to enter the same information every time you visit our website. We may set these cookies without your consent.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
These cookies track your online activity to help advertisers deliver more relevant advertising or to limit how many times you see an ad. Marketing cookies may share that information with other websites, organisations or advertisers.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
Preferences
{title} {title} {title}