OECD Watch Logo
  • Complaints
    • Stage one: Deciding whether to file
    • Stage two: Preparing and filing the complaint
    • Stage three: Coordination between NCPs
    • Stage four: Initial assessment
    • Stage five: Mediation
    • Stage six: Final statement
    • Stage seven: Follow-up
    • Other filing considerations
      • 2011 or 2023 Guidelines
      • Transparency and campaigning
      • Company responsibility for harm
      • NCP parallel proceedings
    • Filing tools & resources
  • Complaints database
  • OECD & NCPs
    • About the OECD
      • OECD Accession
    • The OECD Guidelines
      • What’s in the Guidelines?
      • OECD Guidelines update
    • National Contact Points (NCPs)
      • List of NCPs
      • Due diligence
    • NCP Evaluations
      • NCP Evaluations
      • NCP Evaluations Methodology
      • NCP Evaluations Outcomes and Analysis
    • Advisory Groups
  • News & publications
    • Subscribe to newsletter
  • About us
    • Our work
      • Research & analysis
      • Policy & advocacy
      • Training & capacity building
      • Remedy campaign
      • Brazil’s Accession
    • Mission, vision & values
    • Team
      • Coordination Committee
    • Members
    • Become a member
    • Donations
    • Contact
Status
Country
Home Chapter II Chapter II Paragraph A10 Page 6

Chapter II Paragraph A10

Enterprises should carry out risk-based due diligence, for example by incorporating it into their enterprise risk management systems, to identify, prevent and mitigate actual and potential adverse impacts as described in paragraphs 11 and 12, and account for how these impacts are addressed. The nature and extent of due diligence depend on the circumstances of a particular situation.

Complaint

Comité de la Solidaridad con la Causa Árabe v. Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF)

Complaint

Human Rights Law Centre and landowners from Loloho and Rorovana areas of Bougainville vs. Rio Tinto

Complaint

Aminigboko Community vs. Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd.

Complaint

Peruvian Indigenous Federations et al. vs. Pluspetrol

Complaint

Society for Threatened Peoples Switzerland vs. UBS Group

Complaint

RAID et al. vs. Glencore UK

Complaint

Community Network Concerned for the Kendeng Mountains vs. HeidelbergCement

Complaint

Public Eye et al. vs. Syngenta

Complaint

KTNC Watch et al vs KEXIM

Complaint

KTNC Watch et al vs Daewoo

OECD Watch Logo

Contact us

Email: [email protected]
Visit our twitter page Visit our facebook page
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
Cookies & Privacy
We use cookies to optimise your experience and improve our website.
Functional Always active
These cookies are required in order to use the website. They ensure that the website works properly and that your user preferences remain known. For example, they save you from having to enter the same information every time you visit our website. We may set these cookies without your consent.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
These cookies track your online activity to help advertisers deliver more relevant advertising or to limit how many times you see an ad. Marketing cookies may share that information with other websites, organisations or advertisers.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Preferences
{title} {title} {title}